Skip to content

Creative, game & research workflows

Choose Creative, Games, or Research. Each workflow leaves editable sources and an output you can inspect.

  1. BriefTask + constraints
  2. BuildEditable source
  3. RunOpen or play it
  4. ReviewCompare the result

Record requirements, references, candidate directions, and feedback in CREATIVE-BRIEF.md. Compare layouts, camera views, or short previews before selecting a direction.

WorkKeepFinish withPrompt example
Browser designsource, assets, tokensviewport screenshots and interaction“Implement the selected card layout; capture desktop and mobile states.”
Blender/game asset.blend, scripts, textures, export settingsrender, reopened scene, destination import“Make the selected prop; render it and import the GLB into the project.”
Motion/videocomposition, source audio, editable timelineplayback, frames, audible output, reopened project“Animate the chosen transition; export a preview and reopen the timeline.”

Use creative workflows for templates, provenance, and evidence boundaries.

Use router to find the engine’s build and test commands:

Use router. Own the dash mechanic and its existing tests. Run the project’s
documented narrow build, then play the dash path in its target runtime. Return
the changed files, test command, capture path, and any untested device boundary.

Run existing deterministic tests, then exercise the actual input-to-outcome path in the engine, browser, or emulator. A valid GLB does not establish material, scale, animation, timing, audio, input, or gameplay use. See game development.

Use primary sources for drift-prone facts and label direct evidence separately from inference.

ResultEstablishes
Numerical/CAS resultIts stated inputs, assumptions, software, and precision
Literature sourceThe source’s claim, scope, and status
Lean buildThe checked statement elaborates in that environment
Formal certificationThe additional reviewed conditions for the repository claim

Use math routes and scientific review. A bounded computation or compiled formalization does not establish a different theorem.

Use researcher. Does current official API documentation support setting X in
client Y? Search official documentation only. Return the direct URL, retrieval
date, supported-client wording, and whether the conclusion is evidence or
inference. Do not edit files. Write excerpts to /tmp/api-setting-research.md.

The parent can use that artifact to decide whether local client-version verification or an implementation change is justified.